The challenge
A manager leaves a locked office at 6 p.m. The next morning, a report is on the desk even though the lock log shows no entry. The report was not there when the manager left. How is that possible?
Solve this medium lateral challenge, then compare your reasoning with the hint, checked answer, verification, and variation.
A manager leaves a locked office at 6 p.m. The next morning, a report is on the desk even though the lock log shows no entry. The report was not there when the manager left. How is that possible?
A locked door restricts people, not every way an object can move.
The report could have been delivered through an internal document slot, printed remotely by a printer inside the office, or placed by someone already inside before the manager checked. The facts do not identify one answer, so a good investigation tests these channels rather than declaring a culprit.
In real investigations, list multiple explanations and seek discriminating evidence.
A defensible conclusion requires evidence that supports one channel while weakening the others. The prompt alone supports several answers.
Choosing one clever answer and calling it proven ignores other explanations that fit the same facts equally well.
The lock log constrains entry through the logged door, not every path by which a document can appear. List channels for people, paper, and digital output before selecting an explanation.
Suppose the office has no slot and the printer was unplugged. What evidence would determine whether someone remained inside after 6 p.m.?
Study hypothesis-driven problem solving for the reusable method behind this challenge. Then explore the lateral thinking challenges learning path for connected examples and practice.