Free reasoning test with explanations
This 12-question rotating practice set covers deduction, probability, patterns, and verbal logic, with an explanation for every answer. It is not an IQ assessment.
What will the result show?
The final screen separates performance by reasoning operation. It shows where a rule, probability model, pattern, or verbal inference broke down instead of turning the answers into a personality label.
Four skills remain separate
Deduction and verbal logic track whether conclusions follow from stated rules. Probability and patterns track whether you model outcomes and changing relationships correctly. Each area receives its own count so one strong skill cannot hide another that needs practice.
What this test measures
The questions sample several reasoning operations: applying a rule, detecting whether a conclusion follows, comparing probabilities, and checking a pattern. A short test cannot produce a stable IQ score. Use the explanations to find the kind of mistake you made and choose what to practice next.
How the score works
Each of the 12 questions contributes one point. Every session draws three questions from each of the four skill areas. The total is a count of correct responses in that practice set, not a percentile, diagnosis, or estimate of general intelligence. Two equal totals can hide different needs, so review the explanation for every item and group misses by reasoning type rather than relying on the overall number.
How to use your result
Record the question type, your first interpretation, and the rule used in the explanation. Then solve a fresh problem of the same type without looking back. Improvement means applying the corrected rule in a new setting, not remembering this answer. Treat the score as a practice snapshot rather than a label or comparison with other people.
Choose the next practice task
If a conditional rule caused trouble, translate it into a statement and its contrapositive. For probability, list the complete outcome space before comparing chances. For patterns, state more than one possible rule and ask what evidence favors one. For verbal logic, separate the exact claim from an inference that merely sounds plausible.
Continue with the conditional logic guide, review common logic puzzle mistakes, or generate a new task with the logic puzzle generator.