Why map causes before investigating?
Method: A cause map widens the candidate set before evidence narrows it. Categories are prompts for coverage, not proof that every category contains a cause.
Map competing cause mechanisms
- State the failure without assigning blame.
- Add one plausible mechanism to each relevant category.
- Write an observation that would support or weaken each mechanism.
- Collect the cheapest discriminating evidence first.
Separate a queue problem into testable branches
For repeated checkout delays, process may include approval steps, tools may include a slow terminal, environment may include peak traffic, and people may include training gaps. Queue timestamps can separate several of these explanations.
Categories organize hypotheses, not findings
Choose evidence that separates explanations
The strongest next observation is not the one that adds the most detail. It is the one that different hypotheses predict differently. Timestamps may separate peak-load delay from a constant configuration problem, while another interview that repeats the symptom may leave both explanations equally plausible.
Empty categories are acceptable. The goal is coverage of plausible mechanisms, not visual balance. Retire a branch when evidence conflicts with a necessary prediction and record why it was removed.
Boundary of the result
A populated box is not a verified cause. Keep hypotheses and findings visibly separate.
Continue with the method
Use the root cause analysis guide and the fishbone diagram article and the urgent and important priority matrix to move from a quick result to a complete reasoning process.